Closes #10.

Summary

When the rate-limit middleware refuses a request, the response now carries enough information for the frontend to render a precise countdown instead of a generic "try again later":

• `Retry-After` header with integer seconds until the next request will succeed (per RFC 7231 §7.1.3).
• Structured body shape:
  ```json
  {
  "detail": {
  "code": "rate_limited",
  "message": "Too many requests on POST /auth/jwt/login. Try again in 42 seconds.",
  "limit": "5 per 1 minute",
  "retry_after": 42
  }
  }
  ```

The reset timestamp comes from `limits.strategies.MovingWindowRateLimiter.get_window_stats(item, key)`, which after a refused hit reports when the oldest in-window request rolls off — i.e., when capacity will next open up. Clamped to ≥1s so the frontend never gets a zero/negative countdown from edge timing.

Stable contract

• `detail.code === "rate_limited"` is the discriminator the frontend should match on (not the message text).
• `retry_after` (body) and `Retry-After` (header) always agree, so the frontend can read either.

Test plan

• `tests/test_rate_limit_feedback.py` — 3 tests:
  • Hammers `POST /auth/register` (3/min) past its limit; verifies the 429 has the new header and the new body shape.
  • Confirms `message` says `"1 second."` vs `"N seconds."` correctly.
  • Hits `/health` 20× to confirm the middleware is path-scoped and doesn't fire on un-limited endpoints.
• Full suite: 128 passed.
• `uv run ruff check . && uv run ruff format --check .` — clean.

Frontend follow-up

Auth-web's existing login / register error handling currently shows a generic error on 429. Once this ships, the frontend can read `detail.retry_after` and render a countdown ("Try again in 0:42") for a much better UX. Not blocking — backwards compatible because old handlers will just show whatever they did for the generic 429 string, and the new error shape doesn't break form-validation flows.